Prediction of Paul Capdeville vs Mao-Xin Gong Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Capdeville vs M. Gong

Paul Capdeville

CHI

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

5'10" (178 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

294

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$467.5K

Career Money

$520

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Mao-Xin Gong

CHN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

5'10" (178 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

294

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$467.5K

Career Money

$520

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Capdeville 1 - 0 Gong

They have played 2 sets in total, with Paul Capdeville winning 2 and Mao-Xin Gong winning 0. The last match between Paul Capdeville and Mao-Xin Gong was at the Lexington Challenger, 20-07-2010, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Paul Capdeville getting the victory 6-3 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Capdeville	1
Gong	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Lexington Challenger(07-20-10)

Stats

Paul Capdeville

Mao-Xin Gong

P. Capdeville vs M. Gong H2H Profile

P. Capdeville	Stats	M. Gong
$467,483	Career Prize Money	$520
56.47% (393-303)	Career Total W/L	55.06% (212-173)
1	Hard	0
10	Titles	5
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. Capdeville vs M. Gong Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul Capdeville has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mao-Xin Gong has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul Capdeville, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mao-Xin Gong has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Paul Capdeville has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mao-Xin Gong has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Paul Capdeville has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mao-Xin Gong winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Paul Capdeville has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 137/95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/15). Mao-Xin Gong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 185/140), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 9/17).
Player level: In the last year, Paul Capdeville has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mao-Xin Gong has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paul Capdeville winning 1 times and Mao-Xin Gong being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Paul Capdeville winning 2 and Mao-Xin Gong winning 0.
The last match between Paul Capdeville and Mao-Xin Gong was at the Lexington Challenger, 20-07-2010, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Paul Capdeville getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul Capdeville has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mao-Xin Gong has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul Capdeville has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mao-Xin Gong has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul Capdeville has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mao-Xin Gong has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Paul Capdeville vs Mao-Xin Gong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Capdeville vs M. Gong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Capdeville	Stats	M. Gong
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Capdeville Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Santiago Challenger - 14-04-2014
R2 James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-7(5) 6-3 6-4	Stats
R1 Guillermo NunezG. Nunez	W	6-1 6-0	Stats
Barranquilla Challenger - 24-03-2014
R1 Adrian UngurA. Ungur	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Panama City Challenger - 17-03-2014
R1 Guido AndreozziG. Andreozzi	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Australian Open - Melbourne - 13-01-2014
Q2 Taro DanielT. Daniel	L	6-0 6-4	Stats

View All

M. Gong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Chengdu Challenger - 29-07-2019
R2 Ji Sung NamJ. Sung	L	7-6(2) 6-1	Stats
R1 Min-Kyu SongM. Song	W	3-6 7-6(9) 7-6(2)	Stats
Bangkok Challenger - 08-01-2018
Q2 Lukas OllertL. Ollert	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Q1 Worarin KumthonkittikulW. Kumthonkittikul	W	4-6 6-3 6-1	Stats
Suzhou Challenger - 23-10-2017
Q1 Rigele TeR. Te	L	7-6(4) 6-1	Stats

View All

P. Capdeville vs M. Gong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Capdeville	Stats	M. Gong
56.47% (393/303)	YTD Win/Loss	55.06% (212/173)
54.91% (923/758)	Sets Win/Loss	52.60% (465/419)
51.68% (8157/7627)	Games Win/Loss	51.47% (4209/3968)
59.05% (137/95)	Hard Win/Loss	56.92% (185/140)
57.28% (236/176)	Clay Win/Loss	34.62% (9/17)
43.33% (13/17)	Indoor Hard W/L	53.33% (16/14)
31.82% (7/15)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (2/2)
0.18	Aces Per Game	0.07
1354	Aces Total	261
0.13	Double Faults Per Game	0.08
979	Total Double Faults	338
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
600.51	Average Opponent Rank	571.02
61% (15950/26099)	1st Serve %	59% (3624/6102)
68% (10875/15950)	1st Serve Win %	66% (2380/3624)
49% (4995/10154)	2nd Serve Win %	46% (1147/2478)
42% (1090/2614)	Break Points Won % (Total)	44% (223/507)
40% (10444/26327)	Return Points Win %	37% (2232/5958)
55.56% (40/32)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
50.00% (18/18)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/6)
47.83% (11/12)	Cups W/L	50.00% (2/2)
48.94% (69/72)	Main Tour W/L	12.50% (1/7)
59.80% (244/164)	Challenger W/L	49.17% (59/61)
68.75% (11/5)	Futures W/L	60.73% (150/97)
58% (374/648)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	55% (203/372)
38% (15/39)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	40% (2/5)
48% (101/210)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	47% (49/104)
52% (126/243)	Deciding Set Win %	60% (70/116)
83% (394/327)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (199/176)
17% (394/67)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (199/22)
22% (301/65)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (186/35)